Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Heading 5
Choose your role:
Garcia v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 857 - 2023 ONCAT 51 - 2023-03-30
Corporation:
GPSCC 857
Date:
2023-03-30
Summary:
In the case of Garcia v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 857, the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) issued a consent order based on a settlement agreement between the parties[1]. The applicant and the respondent, Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 857, agreed to resolve the dispute through a consent order[2]. The settlement agreement stated that if either party failed to comply with the agreement, the other party could file a case with the CAT requesting an order[4]. The CAT found that the respondent breached the settlement agreement by not paying $75 to the applicant within the agreed timeframe[5]. As a result, the CAT ordered the respondent to pay $80 ($75 for the owed amount and $5 for postage) to the applicant by mail, and also reimburse the applicant $125 for the filing cost[8][9]. Compliance with the order is enforceable through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice[10].
Under:
CAT Decisions - Consent Order
Compliance with Settlement Agreement
Fees, Costs, Penalties
Verdict:
The case of Garcia v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 857 was heard by the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) in Ontario, Canada. In this case, the parties reached a settlement agreement during the Tribunal's Stage 2 - Mediation process. However, the Respondent breached one of the conditions of the settlement agreement by failing to pay the Applicant the agreed amount of $75 within the specified timeframe. As a result, the Applicant filed a case with the CAT requesting an order.
In the consent order issued by the CAT, it was agreed that the Respondent would pay the Applicant $75, plus an additional $5 for the cost of postage, by March 31, 2023. Moreover, the Respondent agreed to reimburse the Applicant for the cost ($125) of filing the application within 30 days of the order. If either party fails to comply with the terms of the order, enforcement can be sought through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice[1].
Takeaways:
Here are 3 takeaways from the Garcia v. Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 857 case:
Settlement agreements are binding on parties, and if a party fails to comply with the agreement, the other party can file a case with the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) requesting an order.
Compliance with a CAT order is mandatory, and failure to comply can result in the order being enforced through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
In this case, the respondent agreed to pay the applicant $75 plus the cost of postage as a breach of a prior settlement agreement, and also agreed to reimburse the applicant $125 for the cost of filing the current application. These payments were required to be made within specific time frames, with the consequence of enforcement through the court system if not complied with.
Recommendations:
Clear Communication and Documentation: Parties involved in any settlement agreement, such as the one in this case, should maintain clear and comprehensive communication throughout the process. They should document the terms, conditions, and deadlines of the settlement agreement accurately. This helps avoid disputes and ensures that both parties are on the same page regarding their obligations.
Timely Compliance: To maintain the integrity of the settlement process, it's essential for all parties to adhere to the agreed-upon terms and deadlines. Compliance with the settlement agreement is crucial for a successful resolution. In the event of a breach, as in this case, the affected party should promptly seek redress as stipulated in the agreement.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Parties involved in condominium-related disputes can consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation or arbitration, as demonstrated in this case. These mechanisms can help expedite the resolution process, save costs, and allow parties to maintain more control over the outcome. Encouraging the use of these mechanisms can be a proactive approach to handling condominium disputes.